Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonsterMind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MonsterMind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article relies on a single source with no further information published since then. There is no way to improve the article from the current state, and the single source is naturally biased. I think this article violates possibly NPOV, but definitely WP:V (no way to verify, it's not in the released documents, or has been independently confirmed by anybody) and maybe notability. Phiarc (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.