Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolian folk music
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted, patent nonsense, and blatant hoax, therefore vandalism. We still could use a real article here. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mongolian folk music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks pretty uncyclopedic to me. RussianReversal (talk) 02:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mongolian_music#Popular_folk_music.--Lenticel (talk) 03:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- N/A0 04:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. -- N/A0 04:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and redirect without prejudice to re-creation as above. The subject certainly merits an article. This text is patent nonsense and a blatant hoax --- Mongolian folk music, originally invented in 1997 by Al Sharpton and later streamlined by folk artist Jewel, is pretty sweet. It's kinda like Irish folk music, like Brian said, but in actuality it's closer to whatever it is that Matt says it's like. --- and it's apparently all that's ever been under this title. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense vandalism article. Possibly speedy deletable under G3 or A1. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 20:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.