Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moladi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and cleanup (non-admin closure) - ƬheStrike Σagle 18:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moladi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is primarily an advertisement and not of a notable company. Stifle (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)9[reply]

Comment There seems to be a decent amount of coverage about the company in secondary sources, perhaps enough for an article. However, the point about the article being written like an advertisement is spot on - this needs a major rework. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the argument put forward falls squarely into WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Schwede 66 19:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Has plenty of RS coverage, including an in-depth article in Der Spiegel. Seems notable under WP:ORGSIG "whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society..." – Margin1522 (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per sources found as well as this source [6], The article isn't perfect but personally it seems better to expand instead of deleting. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 20:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.