Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model agnosticism
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 01:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Model agnosticism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Google search shows nothing. There is no reliable source. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Robert Anton Wilson. Wilson seems to be its only noteworthy advocate. Hazillow (talk) 03:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I don't see why we would merge it. I doubt the existence of models, too, and especially "super" models. However, this is not for merging, as it's a fork off the original that didn't need expansion in the first place. (We shouldn't have every yogi's term, either.) Utgard Loki (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources. Epbr123 (talk) 18:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If someone wants to redirect this to an existing article, that's fine, but there's nothing on the page now that makes it suitably notable and verifiable content for Wikipedia. Dgf32 (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think the article should be deleted. I do not support redirect. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.