Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modebeat Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Modebeat Digital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP with no secondary sources, just a directory entry at ZoomInfo. McGeddon (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zoominfo shows they exist, but no WP:ORGDEPTH. As a result, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google turns up all directory entries and no coverage. No claim to notability. Agtx (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software company article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 03:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.