Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Police Command

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Police Command (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overblown article with a great deal of bulleted content, insufficient breadth and depth fo referencing to pass WP:NCORP, moved once to Draft by Onel5969 and not improved since then. Creating editor moved to mainspace more than somewhat prematurely. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it exists, but not enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Following the addition of numerous citations to the article, I think it meets notablity guidelines now. RealKnockout (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. National agencies like this one have always been considered notable. Passes WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep greatly improved by refs added by User:RealKnockout and while sources are largely primary that is unavoidable in a state without free press referring to a government entity. Mztourist (talk) 10:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Now meets GNG thanks to additional refs, and I don't really think a government agency needs to pass NCORP.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.