Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixcrate
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mixcrate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. DJFace1 (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator is blocked for sockpuppetry. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 09:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - No longer fails WP:GNG as the article has since been expanded and improved with references which was lacking prior, including the Vice magazine interview with Oliver Wang in which he mentions Mixcrate, as (in relation to topic of interview) the site was founded by those in the Filipino-American DJ community of the San Francisco Bay Area. Mixcrate was huge worldwide when it was active, and was the most trafficked social network for DJ artists in the United States (per Comscore). ~Hiddenstranger (talk) 03:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Now vastly improved with many reliable, independent published sources including the Forbes source. Hiddenstranger (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please note that the added Forbes source is authored by a contributor, so it is generally considered unreliable. See WP:FORBESCON. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 09:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Forbes article was written by notable author, musician and music expert Bobby Owsinski, not just any unknown. Hiddenstranger (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please note that the added Forbes source is authored by a contributor, so it is generally considered unreliable. See WP:FORBESCON. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 09:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Now vastly improved with many reliable, independent published sources including the Forbes source. Hiddenstranger (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete clearly WP:SOAP, not seeing quality sourcing, notability not evident, passing mention in Forbes does not suffice, it's an advertisement. Acousmana (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.