Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission: Impossible IV (2009 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a clear consensus to delete here, and there is really no need to let this go any longer. --Coredesat 04:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contested prod. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The content is unsourced/rumors. — ERcheck (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 00:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 01:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No IMDB profile for a future release. Article created by Loontheschoon who has a history of making destructive edits [1] --Ageo020 (Talk • Contribs) 01:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. MER-C 01:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Ageo020. CovenantD 02:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per above. Keeping this article is... Mission Imp... ok, I'll stop. :) Pursey 02:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above; Hawke has not been announced, plus WP ain't no crystal ball. --Mhking 02:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and swift Burn it with fiar. WP:NOT Crystal ball. Axem Titanium 02:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT. Way too early for this. Prolog 03:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per norm --150.203.177.218 03:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, come back when you have a press release. Alba 04:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unverified gossip and guesswork. Details about future Mission: Impossible films seem to change with the weather anyway. This article will self-destruct in 5 days. --Canley 05:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete WP:NOT Knowing Is Half The Battle 05:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 06:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No way is that worth keeping.--Seadog.M.S 11:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per nom and everybody else. James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 12:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom TheRanger 13:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT. *drew 14:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete crystalballism. Danny Lilithborne 16:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nominated. AuburnPilot 19:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - not on movies.com --Ineffable3000 22:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above.UberCryxic 01:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.