Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Moore

Notability is based on one regional beauty pageant, with only minor sources referenced. Article is vandalized by its originator, and currently has an incorrect title because of numerous page moves. Full history up to now: [1]. JNW (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should delete the entire article and all links to it. I made it up. I made up the person, and all the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keep.wishing (talk • contribs) 19:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You did not 'make up' Shelley Matheson [2]; you originated the article, and have vandalized it today. And your user name has now changed, too: [3], [4]. JNW (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further note Author claims that title and account changes are due to threatening e-mails [5]. JNW (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is no information listed about this person in the link "Miss World Canada", and only a picture on the "Miss BC Link". That is to say, that the information is not reliable as there is no evidence other than the author's opinion. The one link [6] that has actual information does not include any of the info listed in the wikipedia article.

I believe this article should be deleted because it appears to be a lot of assumptions with no factual evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.69.100 (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to warrant inclusion in the encyclopedia. Does not meet our nobility guidelines. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Content has no credible sources, and has been continually vandalized through out the past two weeks. There is no evidence of any of the material stated in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.69.100 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.