Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Collection of non-notable local pageants/preliminary rounds. Pageant itself is in this article unsourced, all references are for the competitors and most of those sources are not conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and fix as the previous AfD was a clear Keep with reasonable positions that should be no less true today. I recommend tagging the article with any concerns, and hopefully the list article will be brought to fuller compliance with guidelines. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 14:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not impossible that opinions have changed since that first AfD in 2007... The Banner talk 00:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - True, but that would need to be spelled out. What has changed since the original AfD decision? Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 10:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - For instance the wish to have independent sourcing is now far more in focus than years ago. The Banner talk 10:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep per Stevie. I would also like to add that, considering the past history of the nominating user, this is a borderline pointy AfD nomination, IMHO. Ejgreen77 (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess that the trick of attacking the nominator when you have no arguments, is one well know by the administrators. The Banner talk 10:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.