Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirabai Devi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mirabai Devi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The two cited interviews are all I get from my source searches, leading me to suspect Devi fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BIO due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. SITH (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. AD ^Talk 15:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AD ^Talk 15:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note the subject should note be confused with Mirabai or Mirabai Chanu who have similar names but they are notable and different.--DBig Xrayᗙ 15:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG non notable spiritual teacher that lacks significant coverage in independent reliable media. --DBig Xrayᗙ 15:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing, source-wise, has changed since my September PROD. – Teratix ₵ 23:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 10:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.