Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mint.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 03:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mint.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've been prodding a bunch of Yellow Pages spam under the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. ". This one seems borderline and I'd like a 2nd opinion. It won Webby 2009 (other awards seem spammy, a bunch of Top 50, blah blah). Some passing coverage in mainstream media - nothing dedictated, again - Top 50 in Time, Top 25 in PC World, etc. Passing mention in a NYT article. One article about it in CNN Money. Personally I think it all boils down to whether winning Webby Award is sufficient. Now, Webby gives a lot of awards every year, and whatever mint want, is not even on in our incomplete 2009 Webby Awards. So I'd vote delete (hence, this nomination here), but since I been prodding a lot of those spam pages, I may be feeling a bit too deletionist. So, once again - second opinions welcome. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. This is not about the Webby Awards at all. This has received a heck of a lot more than a passing mention in the NYTimes:

3/5/08 "For Mint.com, More Money in the Bank"
8/14/09 "Mint.com, a Finance Site, Raises $14 Million"
08/24/09 "Mint C.E.O. Eyes Canada and Britain for Expansion"
9/15/09 "Intuit Buys Mint, a Web-Based Finance Competitor"
12/03/09 "A 20-Something Makes a Mint (and Sells It to Intuit)"
6/30/10 "Mint.com Expands Into Financial Planning Tools"
7/06/10 "Should You Trust Mint.com?"
01/05/2012 "Resolution: Become a Mint.com Power User"
12/03/12 "Nordstrom and GE Capital Block Mint.com Users

And that's just a selection. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Here's more sources: [1], [2], [3]. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.