Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minghao Xu (2nd nomination)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:53, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Minghao Xu
AfDs for this article:
- Minghao Xu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously nominated with no consensus (only one additional opinion than mine, and that was a "not sure"). I still think notability is questionable but not clearly unnotable. Further discussion is requested. But as it stands, my opinion is delete. --Nlu (talk) 22:24, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 04:48, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 04:48, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 04:48, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 16:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable filmmaker Seasider91 (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Filmmaker? As his works are not intended for theatrical distribution, artist is more applicable. We consider WP:ARTIST and look to see if his works have recieved the requisite coverags or made an imapct, English or non-English. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Comment Looking away from English language only sources for this German-born Chinese filmmaker working with fractal art, we find over 1,600 g-hits. Yikes. Help is needed from Chinese-reading Wikipedians and German-reading. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non notable artist. Lots of references are just to his own web page, and he does not seem to have achieved anything that would make him pass WP:ARTIST. Also a side note: Please do not relist this debate again, it has been relisted five or six times already (including the first AfD). —Kusma (t·c) 12:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to respond to MQS' request for foreign-language speakers above, I don't speak Chinese but my German's pretty good. Based on the German-language sources I've been able to find, I wouldn't dream of trying to write an article about this character, and I can't recommend that we keep this around.—S Marshall T/C 23:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. Mindful though I am of WP:CANVASS, I've taken the liberty of asking Timotheus Canens to read the Chinese sources for us.—S Marshall T/C 00:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Chinese ghits are utter crap. Virtually all are unrelated random stuff; the Chinese source linked from the article is roughly a press release from the museum hosting an exhibition on his work. T. Canens (talk) 09:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.