Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimics (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mimics (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unremarkable app that launched this month - may be a case of TOOSOON ... not broad coverage in RS DarjeelingTea (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 00:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:GNG with too few reliable secondary independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Terrible name to search, but no obvious hits beyond those already in article. PG review is good. TA is too short. This may get more reviews, but is currently WP:TOOSOON. May be userfy for the author. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough sourcing to meet the GNG. The only 2 sources I could find are the two in the article, which are reliable, but don't really provide significant coverage. One is really short and one is okay, but hardly something you can write an article around. Usually I'd prefer to merge/redirect in cases like this, but it doesn't seem like any sort of notable series/developer/publisher/other articles exists in this case. Sergecross73 msg me 18:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.