Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikey Nicholls
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mikey Nicholls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:N due to lack of independent third party sources. None can be found that satisfy WP:RS. !! Justa Punk !! 00:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It doesn't meet notability. ― LADY GALAXY 15:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't meet WP:BIO, no presence in Google news and only 30 mentions in blogs. Burzmali (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it wasn't for the edit history I'd suspect this was a backyarder with delusions of granduer. GetDumb 21:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete BIO -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I think everything has been said, WP:N. Tiptoety talk 00:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I sense self-promotion. --Revanche (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Revanche. Vanity article. TaintedZebra (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable wrestler. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that I shouldn't base my vote on this, and I won't, but a Google search gets me 31,000 hits, some of which seem pretty reliable. D.M.N. (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.