Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Sun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted as a speedy because of the repeated, explicit ([1] [2] [3]) requests for deletion from the creator--not simply keeping it around in userspace. Although that's a reasonable assumption, between WP:G7, WP:BURO, and/or WP:BLP's spirit of no-harm, I feel it safer to stick to the letter of what was requested. I'll drop a note to the user with a few options for WP:UNDELETE and userfying if that's what they actually end up wanting. slakr^\ talk / 07:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like personal promo. Unsourced at the most essential parts. The Banner talk 11:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - probably an autobiography (see Special:Contributions/Sue0683), isn't kept neutral (WP:NPOV) and described person isn't exactly notable (WP:GNG). Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 15:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject meets WP:BASIC. Indepth coverage in these sources: [4] [5] [6]. More sources can be found through a baidu news search. NPOV problem can be fixed through regular editing, not deleting.--Antigng (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The creator of the article posted a request to delete this on my talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CutOffTies&diff=665572575&oldid=664830038 --CutOffTies (talk) 05:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy? The creator may not know about the userfy option. If the article needs more work, moving it to the user space could take the pressure off the creator, who appears not to be a seasoned editor. I always like to suggest, also, the articles for creation process, painful though it may be, but it puts a new editor in touch with more seasoned WP participants. LaMona (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Userspace: The creator of the article asked for it to be deleted, as mentioned above, and they are the only major contributor to it. They said they want to go back to it at a later time, however. Moving it to a userspace draft encourages the editor, who is acting in good faith, to continue contributing. The original author should also be referred to WP:MADEDRAFT to help them gain a better understanding of the core issues of creating an article. ~ Rob^Talk 13:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Userspace: No opinion on notability given that I can't read the Chinese-language sources; userfy though, given that the creating editor appears to be working in good faith. I don't think outright deletion is necessary in such cases; the article can stay up in draftspace until the editor has found the sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.