Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Senica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Senica

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Didn't wrestle in a top promotion as a wrestler, and no evidence that he really worked for World Wrestling Entertainment in any notable capacity as the article claims. A Google search for his career as a Nascar driver turns up only networking sites. Nikki♥311 03:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 03:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Slow Delete It needs some references from different sources as this article is barely reliable. Joker264 (talk) 06:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable wrestler and the article is not stylized per WP:PW. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 09:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Mr. C.C. and there are very little references to his wrestling career and none mention WWE or a lot of the industries it said he worked for.--C23 C23's talk 01:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.