Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike O'Donnell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Michael O'Donnell. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike O'Donnell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable musician. Quis separabit? 03:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Michael O'Donnell disambig page. Does not seem to have expanded from one ref for many years. Dl2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if needed and then redirect as this would be better served as a disambiguation page than this current article (nothing at all to suggest a better notable article). SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the notability claims meet WP:BIO criteria. No evidence of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources]]. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.