Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mifren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mifren

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO for a long-defunct failed social networking site that does not pass WP:NCORP. All the refs are to press releases or its own (now non-existent) website. Only hits I can see in RS are for Multi Input Fuzzy Rules Emulated Network, a completely unrelated—and also apparently non-notable—concept in robotics. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Website doesn't work (supports claim that site is defunct), and I couldn't find any significant coverage in my search. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article sourced only to the vendor's own single-post Blogspot, with other press releases as External Links. No evidence found that this proposition achieved any notability during its brief existence. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Less Unless (talk) 10:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the site. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - literally zero coverage. Never heard of it. Bearian (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.