Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Club 3: DUB Edition soundtrack

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Midnight_Club_3:_DUB_Edition#Soundtrack. MBisanz talk 23:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Club 3: DUB Edition soundtrack

Midnight Club 3: DUB Edition soundtrack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS, WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant from reliable secondary sources. Merging content to Midnight Club 3: DUB Edition would be inappropriate per WP:VGSCOPE. The1337gamer (talk) 18:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only nom has discussed in afd
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk Be a guest 09:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'm usually against these sorts of "soundtrack spinouts", but that's usually because there's no sourcing. The IGN source in the article is actually pretty detailed, and actually specifically dedicated to the soundtrack itself. If there's any other sourcing out there, it could actually be one of the few valid ones. That being said, it shouldn't just be a giant track listing either - if no one's going to actually write an article, a redirect could be warranted as well. Sergecross73 msg me 13:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge text and not track listing to existing section: Midnight_Club_3:_DUB_Edition#Soundtrack. Redirect shouldn't have been reverted in the first place. Always good to clean up the redirection target to make sure the redirect sticks (if you leave circular redirects, readers get irked). I'm not seeing a preponderance of independent coverage on the soundtrack to warrant a separate article but there's always summary style. I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar 05:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: moved to newer log Your welcome | Democratics Talk 11:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk 11:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - While there is a source on it, considering there's currently zero prose in the article, and zero content about it at the parent article, it should be merged back for now, and only spun out that WP:UNDUE weight is being focused on it at the parent article (which we're nowhere close to currently.) Sergecross73 msg me 12:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.