Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlesbrough and Teesside Philanthropic Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With only 3 people participating in the discussion, one cannot say with certainty that we have established a consensus. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesbrough and Teesside Philanthropic Foundation

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, contested CSD deletion because "The BBC reported on the organization". External links are only on job creation provided by the organization, however, the overall article appears like a press release. Dusti^*poke* 15:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now -- This is potentially a significant initiative to regenerate a rundown town. The subject may need to be reconsidered in a year or two from now. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: news coverage, Charity Commission registration (I've added the link), acknowledged on MHFC website (EL added). Seems notable. PamD 19:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.