Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micky Shiloah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Micky Shiloah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. The primary notable claim here is a two-episode guest role in a television series, which is not an automatic inclusion freebie in and of itself, and the other "can also be seen in" roles listed here were all one-shots. And meanwhile, the only source here is a short blurb, which isn't enough to get him over the bar all by itself.
NACTOR #1 is looking for multiple significant roles, not just one -- but it's not the significance of the work that matters, but the prominence of his specific role within the work, and even that still has to be supported by passage of WP:GNG on more than just one short blurb.
There may, further, be some sort of WP:COI here, as this was created in 2016 by an editor who has no other edit history at all besides periodic updates to this article and one deleted draft of the "So-and-so is a person who exists, the end" variety about another actor. Bearcat (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all roles appear to be bit parts, not at ACTOR yet. Perhaps in the future. Oaktree b (talk) 15:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NACTOR (only one vaguely significant role) and WP:GNG. Apart from the very brief source cited in the article all I could find was this paragraph in a book which probably isn't reliable (and may well have been written by the subject). Hut 8.5 17:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.