Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Topschij
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone who participated. Please keep all responses to closure civil. If you wish to contest the results, please visit deletion review. Missvain (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Michael Topschij (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CSDd yet author removed tag. Blatantly non-notable. Only a single independent source is available. Author's been trying to spam articles with the subject's name, etc. Likely autobiography or COI, the author of which seems to believe 3000 twitter followers amounts to being notable. His argument (posted on my talk page) states "has an amassed online following". 5 IP addresses later tried removing the AfD tag. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- delete self promotional WP:AUTOBIO created by a single purpose editor so COI concerns as well. LibStar (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- delete per FoCuSandLeArN and Libstar. Clearly self-promotion.-gadfium 19:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I am not sure any number of twitter followers would make one notable, but 3,000 does not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete because he is just not notable at all. But as for Twitter followers, the top 100 people with most Twitter followers have between 13 and 89 million followers each. I suggest they are all notable if for nothing else but a good following. Schwede66 09:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.