Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael E. Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Almost all of the provided sources contain very superficial and incidental coverage of the subject, not enough to establish notability. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael E. Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reliable sources - New York Times - which appears to partially covering the subject. News search and book search doesn't have proper mention of the surgeon. Marvellous Spider-Man 07:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can't find any significant coverage —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I have found some sources about him in notable news. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] - Mar11 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep a quick check finds a couple sources BobLaRouche (talk) 04:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete who ever wrote this said that Jones "pioneered "ethnic rhinoplasty". I searched pubmed:

PMID 26616712 (a 2016 review called "Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical Pearls" gives him no such credit.

PMID 26616700 (a 2016 review called "Reshaping of the Broad and Bulbous Nasal Tip") gives him no such credit.

PMID 25049123 (a 2014 review called "African American rhinoplasty.") gives him no such credit.

seems this article is here for promotion. Jytdog (talk) 03:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable.Variation 25.2 (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Sources provided by Mar11 are notable. A quick search finds a couple of sources on google. Variation 25.2 (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yep he is a celebrity doctor and there are some hyping refs but that doesn't necessarily lead to N. Jones is marginally notable at best and with the promotional pressure of celebrity-doctornhood this will be a drain on community resources to keep neutral. Not Notable enough to be given those resources. Jytdog (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.