Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dyett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Dyett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

News only has a single, trivial mention of this subject. Newspapers has another single cite, but it's about the firm, not the individual. Books revealed quite a few, but they are about a different Dyett, from the 19th century. Scholar revealed several trivial sources. Highbeam has a few trivial hits. And JStor had zero hits. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An obvious vanity bio. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources discussing the subject in detail as required by WP:GNG and fails to state any possible reason why the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. Msnicki (talk) 05:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG requirements. Note also his partner Rajeev_Bhatia, which also appears to have been self-created -Hydronium Hydroxide (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.