Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De'Shazer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The source added is insufficient to show notability, and while tagged for rescue, no further improvement has been forthcoming. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael De'Shazer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, self promotion. History indicates a connection with 208.120.234.4 used for promoting applyondemand.com, registered to Michael De'Shazer. No notable sources as references. Shritwod (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only reference in the article is to a blog post, and no other evidence of notability seems to exist as far as I have seen. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable apparently self published author. DGG ( talk ) 03:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 06:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue and switched out/added some sources. Silver seren^C 06:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.