Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael A. Lytle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael A. Lytle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While certainly accomplished, searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that they pass wp:gng, nor do they meet any of the other specific notability criteria (e.g. wp:nscholar or wp:nsoldier). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article's sources do not come close to meeting the GNG. My own search did not find the significant independent coverage I believe is needed to meet the GNG. I was surprised by the number of people named "Michael Lytle" or "Michael A. Lytle" that my search found and admit that separating them wasn't easy.Sandals1 (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(OLQuiroz (talk)) I am willing to search and add more references. What kinds of articles and sources should I include? I have included some of his work, and articles that express his honors and titles. Please help!

Delete. Nothing in GS for WP:Prof. Please correct if wrong. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

(OLQuiroz (talk))User: XXanthippe I'm sorry, Im not sure what you mean by "Nothing in GS for WP:Prof. I would like to correct this bio as much as possible, please show me what im missing, please.

Delete I checked WP:Prof, he doesn't meet criteria 1 in that I couldn't find any independent sources to verify a significant impact that he made. And he doesn't meet the other criteria for it. And he doesn't meet WP:Solider. Doesn't pass WP:GNG.JC7V-constructive zone 21:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.