Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MichaelWoodMusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete of redirect created by userfication of original article. No prejudice to future recreation. nancy ^(talk) 20:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelWoodMusic

No assertion of notability, no suggestion of sources. Dicklyon (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:N and WP:V, notability not asserted and could be classed as promotional material. This site, which is cited, doesn't even mention the subjects name. ——Ryan | t • c 07:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:MUSIC, WP:N and WP:V. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 09:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If for some reason this article is kept, it needs to be moved to Michael Wood (music) and a link added to the Michael Wood disambiguation page.--Fabrictramp (talk) 17:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I might have screwed up here, but I advised the new user who created the page to move it to her user space for further work. I've moved it there for her after she created her upage following my advice. The page is obviously not ready for wiki-space, but can be worked on in uspace until it's ready. Sorry if I broke any procedures! Franamax (talk) 20:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I've now tagged the redirect as CSD:R2. Franamax (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.