Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MiJournal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established by the editor requesting the article's preservation. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 19:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MiJournal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSOFT, reliable, third-party sources should discuss software as "significant in its particular field" or it should be "the subject of multiple printed third party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews". I couldn't find any third-party review beyond the one cited, and that establishes it as quite insignificant. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This software is significant in it's particular field due to it's feature set. While encryption, regex search, and syncing are all common feature available in many applications, the combination of these features in diary applications is unique. With regard to being "the subject of multiple printed third party manuals," it is unclear how this application is any less significant than much of the referenced software in the existing List_of_Macintosh_software quick examples: CandyBar,AppZapper,MarcoPolo_(software),etc... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulmar2 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other pages' notability problems are no reason to include this one. I agree that there's a lot of mini-articles discussing minor apps; I've already PROD'd one of them. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NSOFT. I found links to downloads and BLOGS but no reliable sources except the one already contained within the article. Perhaps it's TOOSOON, in which case perhaps this could be considered a SOFTDELETE for de-PRODing again in the future if/when notability is clearly established. -- Trevj (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.