Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Lacayanga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to So You Think You Can Dance (U.S. season 1). j⚛e decker ^talk 21:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Melody Lacayanga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has received some coverage in non-primary reliable sources, but almost all significant coverage is about the subject in the event So You Think You Can Dance (U.S. season 1). Since then the subject has not received significant coverage in multiple non-primary reliable sources (some mentions, but none that would meet WP:SIGNIFICANT. Therefore, the subject falls under WP:BIO1E. As such the article should be deleted, or should be redirected to So You Think You Can Dance (U.S. season 1). RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect sounds like a good idea. Not enough coverage for a standalone article. --MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Either Weak keep or Redirect.Wgolf (talk) 02:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.