Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melaka Forestry Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Malacca Botanical Garden. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melaka Forestry Museum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. museums are not inherently notable. zero gnews coverage for its English and Malay names. LibStar (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I do not find anything online to support keeping this article. Bill Pollard (talk) 02:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 03:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources of depth or substance - fails GNG Burley22 (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Malacca Botanical Garden, the location the museum is located at. Redirects are cheap and this one is plausible. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.