Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Miller (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus - after three relists, nobody here has made a strong policy-based argument that's backed up with either sources or an indication of a thorough BEFORE check. No prejudice against a renomination. ♠PMC(talk) 19:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Miller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AGT contestant. Nothing else out of the ordinary. Fails GNG. Was saved at AFD 13 years ago with the keep vote rationale that sources may exist and RS will be added to her page. 13 years have passed, no RS added. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The nomination here is extremely misleading. This person was the first winner of Miss America's Outstanding Teen, a national beauty pageant. Also, the discussion centered on her beauty pageant win, not on the state of the sources, which is still poor. This is quite different from what the nomination says, and I think that people should give a fair and balanced summary in the nominations. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus to delete, but it would help if participants favouring keep could list some sources to show this subject meets GNG
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dps04 (talk) 10:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aasim 00:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.