Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megabeat 3
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Megabeat 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability per WP:MUSIC and WP:NALBUMS, and completely unreferenced. - MrX 03:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Nothing in the article indicates enough notability to pass WP:N. A quick search on Google brings up a lot of YouTube links, but I don't see any sources indicating much notability. Note that there are also Megabeat 1 and Megabeat 2 articles which have the same lack of notability and lack of reliable sources issues so they should probably be added to this nomination. Holyfield1998 (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.