Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megabeat 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus for band notability is at WP:MUSIC, and consensus is that this one fails (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Megabeat 1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability per WP:MUSIC and WP:NALBUMS, and completely unreferenced. - Mr X 03:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the band's page exists which makes their albums notable. Eeekster (talk) 02:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing in the article indicates enough notability to pass WP:N. A quick search on Google brings up a lot of YouTube links, but I don't see any reliable secondary sources indicating much notability. Holyfield1998 (talk) 14:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google News US and Espana provided nothing relevant for this album and considering the group had several names and such a short-term span, they probably never received substantial coverage. If any, it is probably not Internet-based. SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Following the same reasoning from the band's nomination. There's a hint of notoriety but there are no sources online, and it's not clear whether offline sources exist at all — Frankie (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete not notable. --Shorthate (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.