Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medivia Online

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Medivia Online

Medivia Online (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested with Objecting the deletion proposal. Added citations and linked some articles that I could found. Please let me know if this page needs improvement. I can't see any evidence of this passing WP:NVG nor any other relevant SNG. It does not have significant commentary from published sources that are independent of the subject. Forum posts and wikis are not considered to be reliable or published. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The user added three sources: Indie DB, MMORPG.org.pl, and OTLand. Indie DB is user-authored, OTLand is a forum. MMORPG.org.pl is at least authored, but from a quick glance has no reliability features, such as named authors. WP:VG/SE returns zero hits, even for "Medivia" alone, making a lack of notability apparent. IceWelder [] 11:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not seeing enough here (or in my BEFORE search) to make it pass Wikipedia:Notability (video games). It seems to be a fork of Tibia (video game), maybe it could be mentioned there in a section about spin-offs or such, although right now we hardly have references to even justifying mentioning it anywhere. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Barely found anything about the game. Article looks WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 14:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 4/9 citations are from Medivia Online Wiki which is a fan wiki. As IceWelder said, the other citations are not WP:RS. Not a notable video game. Wario-Man talk 14:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I take a pretty liberal view towards video game articles and this fails even my standards. My searches returned no independent media coverage for this game, which is a pretty bad sign considering how many video game outlets there are out there. So, seems like it fails GNG to me. DocFreeman24 (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.