Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medicity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Medicity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability to satisfy WP:N. References provided are not WP:RS. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep sources have been changed to be notable and reliable. Colbyholbrook (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Colbyholbrook — Colbyholbrook (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

So far as the concern for this company not qualifying and meeting regulations to satisfy WP:COMPANY on wikipedia all needs have been met to show the company is notable. The provided sources as well as the overwhelming industry presence that this company has in its market provide the notoriety.[User:ColbyHolbrook]

I have cahnged sources to be notable included in new sources are: periodicals, respected/credible healthcare news associations, healthcare associations, other news associations of local nature to their articles, published reports/assesments from research/industry analytics firms, and government sites such as the U.S Patent office. Sources now meet WP:N and are notable. New sources provided meet WP:RS and are reliable sources. No Press release or direct links to site are used. All sources are 3rd party. I would very much like the deletion tag taken off of my article. Please respond on this page for anything further. User:Colbyholbrook —Preceding undated comment added 20:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advertising through and through: provides health information exchange (HIE) technological solutions to hospitals, physician practices, health systems, health information organizations, and statewide HIEs across the country to improve care coordination and collaboration....
The company is now one of the largest U.S. technology solution providers for the health information exchange market....

create software solutions that would..
Enable...
Empower ...
Enhance ...
Engage ....

These smart agents enable peer-to-peer connectivity and electronic health record integration. Medicity's Novo Grid solution consists of this patented technology.

This writing qualifies for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising, but the "references" are dodgy too: an "Industry Short List for Health Information Exchange Technologies", a "healthcareitnews.com" website, a marketing research website, a "healthcarenewsdirect.com" website, and a patent application. All of these look like media of limited circulation with no substantial readership outside the trade, and as such fail to convince of notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.