Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediassociates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mediassociates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rare disclosed paid editor created this article in 2016. A lot of promotional material was lopped off nearly immediately, and unfortunately what is left does not demonstrate notability. Most of it is about the columns written by one of the company's officials—whose name isn't mentioned in the article body, and in which case the articles do not even mention Mediassociates itself. There's nothing here beyond coatracking about the state of programmatic advertising, the Businessweek columns, and non-notable awards. I struggle to see this meeting WP:CORP. Raymie (t • c) 21:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 21:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 21:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 21:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, PR --Devokewater (talk) 09:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The references are strange as they hardly mention about the company (Bloomberg's apple reference). Also, its not clear how the company is notable. A desperate attempt to make a company notable which is not. --☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 14:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per norm. This is a PR effort trying to game the system. Northern Escapee (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.