Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Five Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

No improvements since its nomination so I'm closing this as a Soft Delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Media Five Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trash article WP:NCORP Polygnotus (talk) 02:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, Management, and Pennsylvania. C F A 💬 03:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There are major issues with the content, but judging based on notability alone there is nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT. Even a search of Google Books only found mentions which are likely just ads placed by the company looking for clients. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It is acknowledged that simple searches do not result in finding evidence of Media Five Entertainment's notability. However, we are in the process of doing research of primary documents- newspapers, magazines and television news of the eastern PA region- to evidence Media Five Entertainment's role in developing recording and performing artists.

  In addition, it is understood as a fact in the professional music business that recording and performing artists simply do not "appear" and "perform" but that there is an entire industry of services and resources that help develop and support such artists. This is particularly true in popular music of the late 20th century.

  I am not attempting to make claims of Media Five Entertainment that are not true but admit that we are doing the research necessary to make the page more credible. We are also attempting to follow style guidelines to ensure we meet the standards of a Wikipedia page.

  We appreciate any and all "flags" and suggestions Wikipedia editors have made and will work to recitify them. Djarm18 (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCORP explains what we need and why. If you have any questions, the WP:TEAHOUSE is a great place to get answers. Have a nice day, Polygnotus (talk) 05:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.