Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medable

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Medable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of sources, but nothing in the article meets WP:ORGCRIT. CNBC is a list of companies they are included in, Forbes in a contributor article, AP looks good until you click the link and see its a press release, everything else is a press release, routine announcement, or unreliable source. A WP:BEFORE found this and this which are the only two references that would come close to ORGCRIT in my opinion. There is an article in Inc. but that is not independent as the info was supplied by the founder. CNMall41 (talk) 05:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.