Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Me2Team
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Me2Team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CSD was declined. Non-notable product. One source covers the company in a different context, the rest of the sources are SPS or otherwise don't support notability. No third-party sources found. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 14:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another web based tool that integrates project, task, team and time management advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I see no secondary source I could call reliable neither in the article nor in the wild. Though the article features the references to ComputerWorld and ITWire that are often considered reliable, the name of this software isn't mentioned in these sources. That said, the half of the article is the Awards section, which mandates speedy deletion per WP:CSD § G11. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.