Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKinney Acres, Texas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 17:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

McKinney Acres, Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, I think a merger with the article on Andrews, Texas may be best for this stub. As this census-designated place has the same zip code as Andrews and is at the southern border of the county. Pahiy (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep With more than 800 people living there, it would pass WP:NPLACE. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As a populated place recognized by the U.S. Census Bureau, this passes WP:GEOLAND. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 11:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets GEOLAND, i think, and further seems likely to have some local history. If it were to be merged, the merger target probably would not be the town Andrews, Texas, to its north, whose article would pprobably not naturally mention this at all. It could more plausibly merged to Andrews County, Texas which has a section mentioning its small communities, ghost towns, this CDP. --Doncram (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND easily. Smartyllama (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND as brought out by above editors, anyway can someone close this as nominator wants this merged which should have been discussed on talkpage in line with WP:MERGE not here at afd..... sigh. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep needs some work, but passes WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T·C 02:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a census-designated place is a legally recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.