Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCaleb Burnett (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

McCaleb Burnett

McCaleb Burnett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable subject. No notable information since previous deletion 15 years ago.

Update: A lot of work was done on this page by Geniustechwizard4556, a sockpuppet of MetaWiz4331, who appears to have a notorious history of creating pages for non-notable actors. AdyFieldston (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I created this nomination page after the original nominator had edited the previous, closed AFD to renominate. I have so far expressed no opinion on the nomination. Skynxnex (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Besides social media links and confirmation of films he was in, the best I can find are Rotten Tomatoes and Shutterstock pages. Deleted in 2007, still appears non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:NACTOR. This nomination was created by an WP:SPA, which I find a little suspicious. Novemberjazz 21:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This keep vote comes from the creator of the article, who has had numerous articles flagged for non-notability, which I find a little suspicious.

  WP:NACTOR doesn't seem to apply as the article subject does not have "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" or "unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." AdyFieldston (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more input from established, unconnected editors would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable. The three sources used on the page seem to be the only RS on the internet to mention his name, and even they only summarily mention him as being in the film the article talks about. WP:NACTOR calls for "significant roles in multiple notable" productions. Burnett's roles in major films/shows have to date been very minor ones, and his major roles have been in decidedly non-notable productions. --Tserton (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with Tserton; the sourcing is not impressive. Doesn't pass the GNG or NACTOR. Nythar (💬-🍀) 04:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.