Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Vishwakarma

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Vishwakarma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be in the news a little for her activism and educational work. But I think this fails WP:GNG. She is not an elected politician. Most of the articles say she moved from California to India. She works to provide menstrual hygiene education. "Vishwakarma’s campaign has come into the spotlight at a time when there is a buzz around the Bollywood movie Padman, set to hit theatres on February 9." Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 05:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Agree with nominator nothing here to substantiate this article. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retain Page Page may have some issues in beginning, but I feel it must be retained and this meets WP criteria of notability, and this satisfied WP guidelines on G11 as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talkcontribs) 08:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non notable person. Fails WP:NBIO. Just another promotional article. --Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 05:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable individual. FITINDIA 17:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.