Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maverick (Mega Man)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mega Man X series. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maverick (Mega Man)

Gamecruft, no references and can easily be explained in the individual series articles.

I am also nominating:

for the same reason.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect to one of the series' articles - Mega Man X series is best. This way the articles are removed from sight while their history is retained for any editors who want to make use of it. As the nominator says, a fair amount of this information would fit other articles. --Kiz o r 09:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This information can be found in many other places online, I don't see why it has to be "retained" when it's unencyclopedic WP:Fancruft. As I stated, enough is already explained that none of this info needs to be merged.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect agreed, in case another editor finds some useful stuff on Mavericks, there is no need to be an article on it. Str8cash (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 'em all, per WP:VGSCOPE. Entirely in-universe; no development history or interesting coverage from third-party sources (except for Game Informer's comment on Boomer Kuwanger). Character information should be included within the brief plot summaries on the game's articles. Marasmusine (talk) 11:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.