Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurizio Cunningham-Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maurizio Cunningham-Brown

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The pseudo-sources largely don't mention Cunningham-Brown aren't independent of him, or are merely trivial coverage. The content is unduly promotional, with the worst parts not even supported by pseudo-sources. Huon (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is a claim a company he is connected in will change the way houses are built. This may or may not be true, but it has not achieved its goals. Until we have reliable sources that demonstrate the company has had broad economic impact we do not have a credible claim for notability. Even then it is unclear if Cunningham-Brown is notable, or just the company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources in the article do not mention the subject, most are somehow related to his activities but don't show any content, like his degree from Manchester University is sourced to the MU website's main page without a link to a list, or him personally. A typical coat-racky spam promotional article of a non-notable person. Google web search leads to business directories, news and book searches yield zero results. Kraxler (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.