Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Ough
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, due to verfiability and notability problems. Davewild (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Matthew Ough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Previous contested prod. Apparently non-notable music performer/producer, no verifiable and reliable sources could be located online to support this article. Given the username of the primary editor, this may be autobiographical. Risker (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I could find no relevant sources with a search of Google News archives, nor anything in a search of a library database of newspaper and magazine articles. Delete unless sources are forthcoming by the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as nn. Fails WP:N. Should have been CSD rather than waste time here.--Sting Buzz Me... 05:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I considered CSD, but there are claims of notability, they simply aren't borne out by research. Risker (talk) 05:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable. Not that search engines are the be-all and end-all, but could find absolutely nothing on this subject. •Florrie•leave a note• 05:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I attempted to prod this some time ago, but User:Matthewough removed the tag without comment. I said then that he didn't appear notable enough due to a lack of third-party coverage, and a second look that I've done just now hasn't convinced me otherwise. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete unsourced and unreferenced Dreamspy (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above. Five Years 12:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.