Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Moskowitz
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Matthew Moskowitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nom, previously speedied as non-notable, though there are references. Posting here to get a more final result, as CSD G4 doesn't apply where the previous deletions were without discussion. Postdlf (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notable third-party coverage on google search. Mystache (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This has been speedy deleted before and has no basis to be here now...Modernist (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can see no signs of notability. Artypants, Babble 19:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Does not meet WP:Creative or WP:NOTABILITY. A google search was unable to locate any independent sources to support notability. Untick (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.