Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Axelson

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 November 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Operation Red Wings. So Why 10:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Axelson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:1E. -- Irn (talk) 01:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep fails WP:SOLDIER, did not receive the second highest award for gallantry (Navy Cross) multiple times, but may possibly meet the GNG "significant coverage" requirement due to media. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of WP:SOLDIER, so I've added it to the rationale, but I think that WP:1E addresses the "significant coverage", since all of that coverage was only due to one event, and neither his role in the event nor the event itself is significant enough to merit an entire article for him. -- Irn (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and optionally redirect name to Operation Red Wings where the subject is mentioned. I note than another member of the 4-person team does not have an article; it has been deleted at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Dietz, so a delete here would be consistent with prior outcomes and with WP:SOLDIER. One of the other two members was awarded the nation's highest decoration for valour, Medal of Honor (SOLDIER#1), while the other survived and wrote a book, which was turned into a movie. Not the case here. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect name to the operation article. WP:Memorial applies. Kierzek (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.