Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateusz Grzesiak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mateusz Grzesiak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremly padded article for a likely non-notable person. His biography has been deleted from Polish Wikipedia several times, and recreated again and again, usually by WP:SPA (their edits can be also seen in the history of our article). It is likely to be removed again (ongoing discussion: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2022:09:25:Mateusz Grzesiak). The only thing we can say is that he is an author of a dozen+ books in Polish (self-help books and similar), neither of which appears notable (won awards, generated media attention, etc). So he fails WP:NAUTHOR and overall, WP:NBIO. (He is described as a scholar, but fails WP:NPROF). Given the persistent recreations in Polish Wikipedia, I strongly suggest this is pre-emptively WP:SALTed if deleted. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Literature, and Poland. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete more ref stacking. Seems rather flowery language also. Oaktree b (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NBIO. I support the nominator's request to SALT, definitely seems like promotional work here. W 42 16:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article require some editions, but it should not be deleted. Elizabeth Oignon (talk) 21:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC) — Elizabeth Oignon (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Considering the fact that the following article went through various editions it shall not be removed. Rafsty (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.