Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master PDF Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Master PDF Editor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources. Just one of many pdf editors. noq (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with nom. Uberaccount (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having been declined at AfC on lack of notability, the article was then put into mainspace. Still a lack of notability, either demonstrated or even asserted. AllyD (talk) 06:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PDF editor for Linux recommended by some Linux distributuons (Ubuntu) and reviewed by some Linux experts (in Russian, in Polish). Gamliel Fishkin (talk) 03:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Master PDF Editor is Best Free PDF Editor for Linux — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.47.55.70 (talk) 12:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article lacking 3rd party refs to establish notability; the above mentioned Polish review is only a paragraph long and does not constitute significant coverage, and it is unclear whether these sources are reliable. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.